It's relatively easy to anticipate first-order effects. It's harder to anticipate second-order effects. It's harder still to anticipate the interactions of second-order effects (and so on). Maybe we'll eventually have an improved Watson to use as a tool to guess where we are going, but I doubt it. The act of guessing, and acting on those guesses, changes the system. That's why speculative fiction, especially dystopian literature, is useful: it helps one to anticipate and avoid some of the bad possibilities. But even that, by insisting on a minimal "realism" will fail to catch black swans. And if it does, nobody will believe them until the very last moment.
In that light, take a look at some speculations from the head of Daimler-Benz. In his limited area, I think he's getting some of the first-order effects, and maybe a few of the second-order effects. But assuming it doesn't all fall apart (always a not trivial assumption) we can figure he's missing ninety percent of what's going to happen. And he fails to consider the political and social pushback. So a few good rules for thinking about the future:
P.S. If anyone has the original source, I'd like to see it.
In that light, take a look at some speculations from the head of Daimler-Benz. In his limited area, I think he's getting some of the first-order effects, and maybe a few of the second-order effects. But assuming it doesn't all fall apart (always a not trivial assumption) we can figure he's missing ninety percent of what's going to happen. And he fails to consider the political and social pushback. So a few good rules for thinking about the future:
- The next year isn't going to change as much as you hope it will.
- The next five years isn't going to change as much as you think it will.
- The next twenty years will change more than you can imagine.
P.S. If anyone has the original source, I'd like to see it.
No comments:
Post a Comment